The Cogito argument
The statement which is necessarily true.
"I am"
or, "I am, I exist" is necessarily true
The name, cogito argument:
cogito ergo sum. I think therefore I am
Suppose skepticism true, suppose that there is an evil demon.
Even so, this statement
cogito ergo sum
is true whenever I state it or mentally consider it
What is the nature of this argument?
1. an inference.
I think, therefore I am
the premise separable from the conclusion
I think
Whatever thinks exists
Therefore I exist
2. This statement is necessarily true
analytic (rather than synthetic) to use the jargon of philosophers
The statement "I exist" must be true, because its denial
I do not exist
Is obviously false
Other analytic statements:
Bachelors are unmarried males
A triangle has three sides
The denial of these statements is obviously false
Peter is a married bachelor
This triangle has four sides
The cogito argument shows that I exist, but what am I?
Surprising that reasoning from such slim premises should yield substantial conclusions