Introduction
Problem Statement
Organizational Background
Players
Proposal
Evaluation of Available Systems
Rapid changes in technology are causing sweeping changes throughout every walk-of- life in the United States and the behavioral health field is certainly no exception. In the past, the field's need for information management was limited. Most computer-based applications were clinical, rather than administrative or managerial, in focus. These applications were used for patient testing and for assistance with evaluation and diagnosis. Beyond that, some behavioral health programs and practices used computers for billing. Community mental health centers used computers for reporting to appropriate funding agencies. Academic behavioral health professionals used computers for research. However, all in all, there were few information systems.
In today's era of managed care financing and delivery of behavioral health treatment services, the need for information has changed dramatically. Access to information has indeed become critical. Today's behavioral health program uses its information system to track patient care, test the assumptions of treatment plans, communicate with payers and other providers, submit and pay claims, determine and analyze costs, and manage pools of patient funding.
Meeting these functional requirements is still not enough. Today's behavioral health information systems must be integrated. The information systems function that tracks patients must communicate with the system functions that monitors treatment plans, which must communicate with the function that submits claims and so on.
The technology is not the only problem for most behavioral health organizations. There is a wide array of software and hardware available that can constitute a system solution for most behavioral health organizations. The challenge lies rather in building the human interface with the computer system. The successful behavioral health organization needs executives and managers who are comfortable with computer-based information and the systems needed to manage it. These same organizations also need staff at all levels who are computer literate. This requires fundamental changes in the roles and responsibilities of most behavioral health professionals.
The integration of Information Technology into a behavioral health setting can be a challenging proposition. While there have been some meager attempts at the use of IT in the medical record systems in some large health care institutions across the country, there has been even less in community mental health centers. This results primarily from three factors: the low-tech nature of behavioral health, the high reliance on clinical knowledge, and finally the prohibitively high cost of IT in a poorly funded sector. In order to survive and even thrive, behavioral health providers and facilities will need to capitalize on the potential benefits of electronic medical records. These benefits include increased quality of care, efficiency of process, and containment of costs.
Allegheny East MH/MR Center, Inc. is a multi-faceted community-based agency serving mentally ill and mentally retarded children and adults residing in the eastern suburbs of Allegheny County. It was founded in l969 in response to the Pennsylvania Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of l966.
Over the past 28 years, Allegheny East has grown from a small outpatient program to a multi-faceted agency providing case management services, outpatient treatment, 24 hour emergency services, day and evening partial hospital programs, training and social rehabilitation programs and many levels of supervised residential programs for MH and MR clients. The agency employs over 250 staff and has an annual operating budget of over $10 million. The major portion of this revenue comes from the County contracts, and additional revenues come from fees for services paid by clients, Medicare, Medicaid, contracts with behavioral health managed care entities, school districts and other organizations. Allegheny East has a Joint Venture with Forbes Regional Hospital for its inpatient services and works with the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, several public school systems and the Allegheny Intermediate Unit, CYS and many other agencies.
There are four sites, as well as on-site services such as those that are school based. We have 24 FTE professional staff consisting of licensed social workers, psychologist, master's level psychiatric nurse, and master's prepared counselors. There are three full-time psychiatrists and four part time contracted psychiatrists. There are support staff such as aids, nine secretarial/billing related and medical records staff, and all departments depend upon, and interact with, several other departments such as the information systems, billing department, and the base service unit which provides intake, case-management, registration and records departments.
We will review and evaluate several behavioral health clinical practice management programs. The evaluations will be conducted in the following process.
In the past, each constituency would choose the application that best fit their particular needs. What resulted was a collection of individual applications that could not interface with each other. This has created an additional administrative burden in trying to get diverse systems to "talk" to one another. In an era of shrinking reimbursement, increasing regulatory reporting, and managed care demands, this inefficiency is no longer acceptable.
The decision becomes: Can we afford to allow each constituency to choose the "optimal" system for their "individual" needs or should we evolve to an integrated system, that, while it may be sub-optimal for any one particular area, serves the overall organizational needs best.
The preliminary decision is that if there is a system on the market that will provide the overall organizational needs while still providing acceptable standards for individual constituencies, then an integrated system would be desirable. The first step of the process was to survey the needs of the "customers", or individual constituencies (clinicians, front desk, etc.) to determine what aspects of an information system are absolutely critical ("must have") vs. those functions that would be desirable, but not essential.
Feature |
Must Have |
Desirable |
Support Staff |
||
Appointment Scheduling |
X |
|
Appointment Templates for each staff |
X |
|
User-Defined code field for appointment reason |
X |
|
Appointment views for multiple practitioners/ Staff |
X |
|
Flexible search for future appointments |
X |
|
Appointment views for multiple staff |
X |
|
User-defined time limits by appointment type |
X |
|
Referral source tracking |
X |
|
Patient recall tracking |
X |
|
Produces patient mailing labels |
X |
|
Unlimited practitioners |
X |
|
Billing Department |
||
Unlimited fee schedules per practitioner |
X |
|
Fee Schedules linked to specific contracts |
X |
|
User defined procedures codes |
X |
|
Multiple coverage per client |
X |
|
Automatic copayment/deductible calculation based on contract/coverage type |
X |
|
Automatic write-off of discounts |
X |
|
Allows time and unit billing |
X |
|
Link to general Ledger packages |
X |
|
Electronic billing |
X |
|
Clinical Staff |
||
Complete client demographics |
X |
|
Capable of printing blank encounter forms for "Walk-ins" or emergencies |
X |
|
Automatic date/time/user stamps for motes |
X |
|
Free-form text fields |
X |
|
Unlimited number of treatment plans templates |
X |
|
User-defined treatment plan templates |
X |
|
Medication tracking |
X |
|
Computerized clinical record |
X |
|
User-defined help screens and prompts |
X |
|
User-defined intake and history forms |
X |
|
DM-IV capable; user-defined codes |
X |
|
Administration |
||
Unlimited contracts |
X |
|
Electronic form designer |
||
Data extract process for PC- based reporting |
X |
|
Staff productivity reports |
X |
|
Capitation / Case Rate tracking and reconciliation |
X |
|
Census tracking by practitioner/ staff |
X |
|
Daily/weekly/monthly transaction reports by user-defined sorts |
X |
|
Utilization Review Staff |
||
Authorization tracking |
X |
|
Authorization limit warning |
X |
Once we determined the needs, we surveyed all known vendors for documentation on their system's functionality as well as demonstration disks on their product and estimates on the cost of implementing their system. In addition, we independently sought out publicly-available product reviews in professional publications as well as the Internet. We also solicited feedback from other organizations who have already implemented any of these systems. The following systems were evaluated but did not sufficiently address overall organizational needs to warrant final consideration.
The systems are also ranked according to pre-determined cost parameters. While functionality is a higher priority than cost, obviously, there is a point at which the cost of a system would outweigh its benefits.
Feature |
QuicDoc |
Therapist Helper |
CMHC |
Appointment Scheduling |
X |
X |
X |
Appointment Templates for each staff |
X |
X |
X |
Flexible search for future appointments |
X |
X |
|
Appointment views for multiple staff |
X |
X |
X |
User-defined time limits by appointment type |
X |
X |
X |
Produces patient mailing labels |
X |
X |
|
Unlimited practitioners |
X |
X |
X |
Unlimited fee schedules per practitioner |
X |
||
Fee Schedules linked to specific contracts |
X |
X |
|
User defined procedures codes |
X |
X |
|
Automatic copayment/deductible calculation based on contract/coverage type |
X |
X |
|
Link to general Ledger packages |
X |
X |
|
Electronic billing |
X |
X |
|
Complete client demographics |
X |
X |
X |
Capable of printing blank encounter forms for "Walk-ins" or emergencies |
X |
||
Automatic date/time/user stamps for motes |
X |
X |
|
Free-form text fields |
X |
X |
X |
Unlimited number of treatment plans templates |
X |
X |
|
User-defined treatment plan templates |
X |
X |
X |
Medication tracking |
X |
||
Computerized clinical record |
X |
X |
|
User-defined help screens and prompts |
X |
X |
X |
User-defined intake and history forms |
X |
X |
X |
DM-IV capable; user-defined codes |
X |
X |
X |
Data extract process for PC- based reporting |
X |
X |
|
Staff productivity reports |
X |
X |
X |
Census tracking by practitioner/ staff |
X |
X |
X |
Daily/weekly/monthly transaction reports by user-defined sorts |
X |
X |
|
Authorization tracking |
X |
X |
X |
Authorization limit warning |
X |
X |
X |
QuicDoc is a Clinical Information System that documents patient care, measures therapeutic progress and treatment outcome, and assess quality of care. Computer generated intake reports, progress notes, discharge summaries, treatment plans, and quality assessment reports are easily individualized. Extensive clinical data lists ( e.g., medications, treatment goals, impairment, etc.) are supplied for report generation. There are more than thirty (30) lists of which the user can customize from the main menu.
Analysis of numerous variables entered during the course of documenting patient care comprise the quality assessment component of QuicDoc. Quality assessment reports can be generated for specific providers, programs, managed care companies, and or by date or date range.
Quality assessment reports summarized a number of variables such as:
You can score and graph the results of outcome measures provided for children, adolescents, or adults. QuicDoc includes the Health Status Questionnaire, Timberlawn Child Functioning Scale, Survey of Sysmptons-77, and the OQ-45 to measure outcomes for individual patients or evaluate aggregate data. You can also input the results of the Beck Depression Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, SCL-90-R, or any other measure, and QuicDoc will track the progress and report on aggregate results. In addition, QuicDoc includes a Patient Satisfaction Survey to assess consumer satisfaction.
Very comprehensive multi-functional program: billing/accounting, word processor, progress notes, customizable screens, mailing labels, phone/address book, pop-up warning screens, automatic calculation of copayments, etc. for managed care. Networkable. Codes for DSM, ICD, CPT, HCFA 1500 forms completion. 400+ context-sensitive help screens. Networking included. Open (not proprietary) database. Therapist Scheduler and "Insurance Connector®" for ECS at extra cost. IBM, DOS, Windows. $495 for solo, $200 per therapist after the first, $97 for starter version (same as solo, but limited to 12 or fewer patients), free literature, $5 for DOS or Windows demo.
The CMHC/MIS includes a full complement of data processing functions, which are carefully engineered to provide an orderly, integrated process. For example, the entry of data to describe a service simultaneously affects the distribution of personnel time, revenue earned, accounts receivable, cost of service, and clinical records. The system supports all parts of the organization: administration, clerical, financial, clinical and general management.
Functions include:
After evaluating all these systems, it was felt that the CMHC system clearly provided the most comprehensive, integrated IT solution for the organization. The system supports all aspects of the practice: administrative, clerical, financial, clinical, and general management. It integrates these various areas into a seamless system that automatically links data entry describing a service to personnel time requirements, revenues, costs, accounts receivable, and clinical records related to that service.
CMHC offers flexible scheduling capabilities with a simple interface that allows appointment searches based on multiple search parameters. It fulfills financial and business requirements including electronic billing, account receivable tracking, general ledger, payroll, and budgeting. In addition, it meets all of the administrative requirements related to reporting to outside regulatory and managed care entities.
Although CMHC offers the most complete integrated system, this does not mean it is necessarily the best system in every particular aspect. In fact, clinicians preferred the QuicDoc system's clinical component. They felt that QuicDoc provides a more comprehensive, flexible clinical component with an easier interface. While, ideally, clinicians would prefer QuicDoc, CMHC did meet all of their "must have" requirements and was an acceptable alternative to them.
A second factor in the selection of CMHC/MIS is that five years ago Allegheny East purchased the CMHC package with the intention of implementing the various modules over the years. The first module to be installed was the accounting module. For the past five years all accounting functions have been executed and stored on the CMHC system. In assessing which practice management software would provide the greatest value to the organization we had to consider that a vital function of our organization has been processed on the CMHC system. And that this system clusters all other practice management functions around the accounting module. Since Allegheny East has this foundation in place, the CMHC systems is the logical choice for the implementation of the clinical practices management system.
While evaluating, testing and selecting systems is a monumental undertaking, it is really only half the battle. The most prolific technology is only as good as the people using it. The challenge lies in integrating the information system with the human component. Not only must executives be adept at managing information technology, but they must provide the leadership necessary to articulate to staff the importance of information technology to the organization's survival.
The greatest challenge will be the providers. Health care providers, and particularly behavioral health providers, tend to be very resistant to any change that they fear may adversely impact patient care. They are understandably, more interested in the human, one-on-one provider to patient relationship and they see information technology as an intrusion on that relationship. Any effort to bring them on board will need to focus on ways an integrated information system will help them treat patients more effectively, and make their jobs easier.
ASD Software, Aeolian Systems and Design, P. O. Box 10874, Rochester, NY 14610. (800) 313-8133. Robert Hale. E-mail: rhale@eznet.net January 27, 1997
Avebury Computing Ltd., Clevedon, Brays Lane, Hyde Heath, Amersham, Bucks, HP6 5RU, England. Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1494 776142. E-mail: midexpro@avebury.co.uk. January 27, 1997
Beaver Creek Software, 525 SW 6th St., Corvallis OR 97333-4324. Sales (800) 895-3344, business (541) 752-5039, support (541) 752-7563, fax (541) 752-5221. Peter Gysegem, President. January 2, 1997
Brand Software, Inc., 500 W. Cummings Park, Ste. 3150, Woburn, MA 01801. Sales: (800) 3-HELPER, support: (617) 937-0080, fax (617) 937-3232. http://www.helper.com. Cheney Brand, Pres.
Cambridge Software Labs, 45 Highland Road, Boxford, MA 01921. 508-352-8909. Paul M. Peckins, LICSW, January 27, 1997
Community Sector Systems, Inc., 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5500, Seattle, WA 98104. 800-988-6392, fax206-467-9327. E-mail: Mail@cssi.com, http://www.cssi.com. January 27, 1997
Decisionbase, Suite 8110-420, 264 H Street, Blaine, WA 98230, (604) 876-2254. 1206-750 West Broadway, Vancouver British Columbia V5Z 1J2. Philip Long, MD. E-mail: pwlong@mental http://www.mentalhealth.com. Note: this is a very rich site. January 27, 1997
Echo Management Group, 1620 Main St., P.O. 540, Center Conway NH 03183. 603-447-5453, 800-635-8209, fax: 603447-2037. E-mail: sales@echoman.com
http://www.echoman.com. January 27, 1997
Micro-Eye. 17560 County Road 85B, Esparto, CA 95627. (800) 787-3194, fax (916) 787-3993, 76012,2207 CIS. January 27, 1997.
O.M.S., P.O. Box 661, Nevada City, CA 95959. 1-800-588-6824. http://www.oro.net/~oms E-mail: oms@oro.net. January 27, 1997.
PC Consulting Group, P. O. Box 69382, Portland OR 97201. (503) 246-7858. (800) 847-8446 sales (and toll-free support). http://www.delphipbs.com/~wpardy Will Pardy. January 27, 1997.
Psychotherapy Practice Manager (TPPM) 113 Hueneme Ave., Channel Islands, CA 93035. (805) 983-3791, (800) 895-1618. E-mail : jhmullin@anacapa.net. Web: http://www.anacapa.net/~jhmullin. Jay Mullin. January 27, 1997.
CMHC/MIS, 570 Metor Place North Dublin, Ohio 43017 (613) 764-0143 http://mis.cmhc.com .
Mental Health Connections Quick-Doc, 21 Blossom St., Lexington, MA 02173. (617) 860-7544. Mhc@mhc.com, http://www.mhc.com Robert Patterson.
Managed Care Strategies, "Technology Primer: Practical tips for behavioral health groups". October 1997, Volume 5, Number 10. Pp. 7-8.
Behavioral Health Management. "Behavioral Health, Inc: Anatomy of an Information System Purchase". Henry Yennie. January / February 1996. Vol. 16, No 1. Pp. 24-25.
Go back to the Project Page
Rema Padman, rpadman@andrew.cmu.edu