Outline
Meeting 14: December 3
Back to quadratic reciprocity, quadratic forms, and cyclotomy
- Recap: algebraic integers, quadratic and cyclotomic extensions
- Recap: unique factorization of ideals
- Primes splitting and ramifying, and Fermat's theorem
- The class group
- The correspondence between quadratic forms and ideals
- Gauss 6
Characterizing structuralism
- Language
- Effects on definitions and concepts (modding out by irrelevant detail, giving invariants algebraic relevance)
- Effects on proofs (controlling indifference types, managing context)
- Benefits: reducing cognitive burdens, modularity, maintaining focus, determining relevance,
outlinability, generalizability
Contrast case studies
- Historical case studies: want clear and striking contrasts
- Need to identify clear limitations and failures vs. successes
- An example: quadratic forms and cyclotomy from Gauss to Dedekind / Hilbert; Kronecker-Weber explains periodicity
Meeting 13: November 19
Dedekind's theory of ideals
- Recap: algebraic integers
- The behavior of 2 in Z[sqrt -5]
- The need for gcd's
- Ideals in a ring of integers
- The unique factorization theorem
- Calculations in Z[sqrt -5]
- Proof of unique factorization in quadratic extensions
Meeting 12: November 12
Gauss 6 and cyclotomic extensions
- Cyclotomic fields, mod q
- Gaussian periods
- Gauss sums and the sixth proof, revisited
The "meaning" of a number-theoretic fact
- Meaning via definitions
- Meaning as use; inferential aspects
- Arana-Detlefsen purity concerns
- Concerns about stability of meaning over time
Meeting 11: November 5
Galois theory: comparison of Galois' and the modern approach
- Overview of Galois' approach
- Small differences: notions get polished, account is more general
- Big difference: eliminating talk of resolvent
- Overview of the modern approach
- Proof that the fixed field of the Galois group of a normal extension is the original field
- Discussion: definitions in terms of algebraic structures; "automorphisms" independent of representation
Theory of algebraic integers
- Algebraic number fields in number theory: quadratic forms, cyclotomic fields (quadratic reciprocity, Fermat's last theorem)
- Quote by H. J. S. Smith
- Historical overview
- Motivating the definition of "algebraic integer"
- Inferring "ideal" factors in Z[sqrt -5]
Meeting 10: October 29
Finite fields
- Factorization of polynomials in finite fields
- The Frobenius automorphism and Galois group of a finite field
Algebraic number fields, modulo q
- Z[x]/(p(x)), p irreducible; modulo q
- p may factor mod q; Z[x]/(p_i(x),q) isomorphic to F_{q^n}
- Pulling the Frobenius back to the Galois group of Q[x]/(p(x))
Specializing to cyclotomic fields, p(x) = (x^p-1)/(x - 1)
- alpha -> alpha^q permutes roots
- order depends only on order of q in (Z/pZ)^*
- Gauss' determination of S^2 means that Q(sqrt p) is a subfield
- Frobenius maps sqrt p to +- sqrt p
Meeting 9: October 22
Properties of the Galois group
- recap: properties of field extensions, definition of Galois group
- each element really is a permutation of the roots
- polynomial expressions in the roots that are fixed by elements of the Galois group
- elements give rise to automorphisms
- Galois group doesn't depend on choice of resolvent
- Galois group really is a group
- The field extension is normal
Moving to higher reciprocity
- Higher reciprocity laws - break symmetry between p and q
- Finite fields and extensions to splitting fields
Meeting 8: October 15
Galois' presentation of the Galois group
- recap: the cubic formula, and primitive 11th roots of unity
- overview of Galois' approach
- interlude: discussion of quote on p. 240 of Tignol. Issues:
- managing / controlling calculation
- moving from particular to general (e.g.~from a particular cyclotomic extension to arbitrary ones)
- avoiding (non-canonical) representations
- getting to the "essence" (Dedekind: "fundamental characteristics")
- background from modern algebra: constructing algebraic extensions
- existence of the Galois resolvent
- the Galois group
Discussion of Gauss' sixth proof
- calculating in a field extension vs. calculating modulo a polynomial
- operating, as it were, with a single root, but behind the veil of symmetry
- interpreting Gauss' lemmas
Meeting 7: October 8
Discussion of Sandborg's thesis
- overview and taxonomy of proofs (inductive, Euler-based, etc.)
- inductive proofs: additivity and base case
- distinction between algebra and geometry
- Niven and Zuckerman proof and SL(2,z)
- From explanation to intelligibility virtues
Gauss sums
- Gauss 4 and 6 generalize to higher reciprocity laws
- Overview of Gauss 4
- Eisenstein's simplification (his second proof)
Meeting 6: October 1
Views on calculation: Euler, Gauss, Galois, Dedekind, Kronecker, Siegal, Abhyankar, Edwards
Composition of binary quadratic forms
Galois theory
- Prehistory: quadratic, cubic, quartic, Lagrange, Vandermonde, Gauss, Abel.
- Solution to the cubic (and Lagrange's analysis)
- Vandermonde's method of obtaining a primitive 11th root of unity
Meeting 5: September 24
More on quadratic forms
- Representability and quadratic residues
- A reduction theorem for positive definite forms
- An algorithm for determining representability
- Composition of forms
Quadratic reciprocity
- On the list of 233 proofs, about 63 are based on Gauss' lemma; many based directly on Gauss #3.
- The calculations in Gauss #3
- Eisenstein's proof
- Comparison: focus on parity, focus on up-to-parity schematic indications
- Coming up: Gauss sums
Meeting 4: September 17
Back to aspects of mathematical understanding
- Recall: substance, control, transparency
- Conventional logic: focus on ultimate result and everything involved in getting it
- One aspect of transparency: stage assessments, using means of expression to cordon off detail
- Example: Hartley Rogers' axioms for computability
- Another aspect: uniformity of treatment
- Suggestive: mode of expression "brings out" a uniformity already known to experts, makes it shareable
- Distinction between two senses of "generality": uniformity of treatment, scope
Galois on computation and elegance: html
Back to quadratic forms
- Composing substitutions
- Invariance of determinant
- Representability and quadratic residues
Meeting 3: September 10
Quadratic reciprocity
- The data: squares and nonsquares modulo p
- Euler's criterion
- Gauss #1: fiddly induction
- Gauss #3: based on Gauss' lemma (and a nifty graphical representation)
Quadratic forms
- Overview
- Proof of Fermat's theorem using the Gaussian integers
- Equivalence of forms
Meeting 2: September 3
Sums of squares
- Background: Fermat's theorem, Lagrange's theorem
- Fermat's theorem on primes representable as sums of squares
- Reciprocity step
- Descent step (Euler's proof)
Aspects of mathematical understanding
- Concerns: indvidualism, subjectivity, historicity; need systematic, shareable criteria
- Substance (nontriviality, of proofs, of consequences)
- Cogency (rigor, precision, maintaining agreement)
- Transparency (surveyability, navigability, isolating key ideas)
Meeting 1: August 27
Philosophical issues
- Euler's 1747 letter on patterns in the prime: "understanding" the raw data
- The relatively recent focus on "certainty" in mathematics, and
Cristopher Clavius
- Issues of stability in mathematics
- Frege and formal notions of proof
- 233 proofs of quadratic reciprocity
- Shifting focus from proof to forms of understanding
Historical overview
- The evolution from Gauss' DA to the Dirichlet-Dedekind supplements
- The world in 1801
- Mathematics prior to 1801
- Overview of the DA