When is a business plan The Business Plan?
ItÕs understandable why you would want to stop at the second
draft, after all the effort youÕve put in. But, in your heart of hearts, you
know that there were assumptions you made that were nothing more than guesses.
You know where you substituted logic for knowledge. You know where you ÒfudgedÓ
some numbers to make the financial statements come out the way you thought they
should.
If you were honest with yourself (and if you are going to be
a successful entrepreneur, you must always be honest with yourself), your
second draft is not what you know it could be, and should be. As much as youÕd
like to stop now, you know that you must press on.
The primary problem with many second draft plans is that
they have not touched the real world.
The real world is not always rational. The real world is a little
messy. It doesnÕt quite perform
the way you think it should. The ÒbestÓ course of action is often not the
course of action that will actually work. The real world is composed of people,
individuals who have a tendency not to be predictable.
You need to talk to potential customers. Will the Òdog eat the dog food?Ó Do
they feel pain? Will your offering remove that pain? Is it a Ògotta haveÓ? What
features do they really value?
What features are they indifferent to? What features are missing? What
would they pay for it? How would the customer expect it to be sold to them? By
a direct field salesperson? Through existing distributors or representatives?
You need to talk to people who have Òbeen there, done that
(or better yet, doing that).Ó What are the successful sales strategies that
will work for a start up company? How long will it take to get regulatory
approval? Do you have a ÒsnowballÕs chance in HellÓ of raising the money you
have calculated that you will need?
The third draft of your plan ill reflect the culture shock
that youÕve experienced as person after person tells you what really happens
when a company such as yours, a team such as yours, tries to create a business.
A natural initial reaction will be to defend your plan. YouÕve worked so hard. YouÕre drinking
your own Kool-Aid so-to-speak. You
want the real world to conform to your plan, not the other way around. But once the defense mechanisms recede,
and you Òget it,Ó you deconstruct your plan to fill in the real world
substance. This plan will no longer be complete and logically consistent. Entire sections will have been eliminated
because you know now that what you wrote isnÕt valid.
This is an enormous hurdle, but if you get beyond it, youÕre
chances of succeeding have increased by several orders of magnitude.
This is a fun and liberating step in the process.
First, you now know that you donÕt need to act as if you
know everything. ItÕs not expected.
Second, youÕve learned that individuals are available to you
and they will share their experiences and resources with you. They will respect you for your
efforts. They will be empathetic
to your needs. They only got to
where they are because people helped them and therefore, they feel the
obligation to help their successors (sometimes when theyÕre only 18, 12, or
even six months removed from doing what youÕre doing now).
During this stage, you will get input overload. YouÕll find that many (all?) of the
issues you are investigating donÕt have a single, ÒrightÓ answer. The
individuals with whom you talk will likely precede their comments with, ÒIt
depends, butÉÓ They will then give you their personal opinions based upon their
experiences.
You will often find conflicting advice from people in the
know about certain specific topics. Is one right and all the others wrong?
Absolutely not! Consider the source. Take a look at the execution. Try to
understand why both may be ÒrightÓ approaches for each INDIVIDUAL. How do you
compare to them?
My rule of thumb:
This is the exciting step in the process. YouÕve gotten good
advice. You now understand what
happens when the Òrubber meets the road.Ó You Òget it.Ó
Now youÕve got to synthesize and integrate all that youÕve
learned into YOUR PLAN. You evaluate the conflicting advice youÕve received to
understand the context of that advice and whether it is or is not appropriate
to you and your company. You DECIDE whatÕs right for you. You look for the
inconsistencies in this emerging plan.
You dig down to understand their sources, to evaluate their importance,
and you resolve them.
You become increasingly confident in the plan that you are
developing. You engage your
mentoring network in debate about critical topics. This time, though, itÕs not your intellect versus their
experience (i.e., after the second draft), but it is between you, the wizened
soon-to-be entrepreneur, versus the seasoned executive. You can hold your own in these
discussions because you know in your gut that what you want to do is the right
thing for you and your company.
You are looking for flaws and these debates may be heated, but they are
done on a peer basis.
Several critical things are going on as you prepare this
draft.
Your confidence in your plan has moved from your head to
your heart and gut. You are emotionally engaged in your business.
You understand the real world of launching your business and
you know what you should do. You
also recognize that these decisions are appropriate for this moment in time,
and that as reality hits you and conditions change, you will need to adjust
your plan accordingly. Blind adherence to a plan thatÕs not working is
foolish. DonÕt let your ego get in
the way of doing what needs to be done.
Perhaps most importantly, you conduct yourself as the CEO of
a start up enterprise. You have
vision. You have confidence. You know that you are on the right path and people
will see that in you.
This is The Plan. It is what you want to do and how you want
to do it. You are confident and passionate about the business opportunity
reflected in its pages.
Now that you know what you want to do, you need to package
the plan to attract the resources that you will need. Each of these plans
(#6-9) shares two common traits.
First, each ÒoozesÓ the substance of an exciting business.
[IÕm the only one I know who tries to explain it this way, but I havenÕt found
a better description or metaphor.] When someone looks at the plan, itÕs obvious
to the reader that this is the real deal.
ItÕs not an intellectual exercise by a bright person who has ferreted
out a market opportunity. It is the work product of a passionate entrepreneur.
Second, it is the same plan in each case, BUT whatÕs
presented and how itÕs presented is dependent upon its audience.
Banks, angels, and venture capitalists may be looking for
certain financial things, so you need to present your business proposition to
them in a certain way. Remember, providers of funds will provide those funds to
you if you can convince them that you will return their capital to them along
with a return on their investment consistent with their charter and risk
profile. At the extreme, your business is nothing more than a black box to them
that going to change a little bit of money into a lot of money. You are selling
an investment opportunity, not your business. ThatÕs a subtle but critical
decision.
Your plan will be a recruiting tool for management team
members. That packaging of the plan has to appeal to them. Can they play a
significant role in the company achieving its plan? Is the potential of the
plan exciting? Will it be financially rewarding? Is it worth the risk of
joining during it infancy when compared to their current circumstances?
Conventional business planning guides make it difficult for
first-time entrepreneurs to evaluate their plans objectively. The process
presented here addresses this issue more directly. Rather than focusing on the
contents of the plan, it asks the entrepreneur to assess ÒsoulÓ of the plan.
Only the entrepreneur knows what he has put into the plan, so only he can know
if itÕs The Plan.
Frank Demmler is Associate Teaching Professor of Entrepreneurship at the Donald H. Jones Center for Entrepreneurship at the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University. Previously he was president & CEO of the Future Fund, general partner of the Pittsburgh Seed Fund, co-founder & investment advisor to the Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, as well as vice president, venture development, for The Enterprise Corporation of Pittsburgh.