|
|
PS8 |
Final |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
83.3 |
Question 1 |
Question 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5.00 |
|
10 |
|
55 |
20 |
100 |
|
Codename |
|
% Delta Von Misses |
Points |
% Delta Displacement |
Points |
% Delta Reaction Force |
Points |
% Delta improved reaction force |
Points |
Submitted? |
Submission Credit |
Analysis Setup |
Comments |
|
Seattle , Washington |
98 |
6.6% |
4.67 |
5.3% |
4.74 |
21.9% |
3.90 |
42.3% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
The reaction force is too low |
|
Norfolk , Virginia |
98 |
17.3% |
4.14 |
11.5% |
4.43 |
9.8% |
4.51 |
39.7% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
This is pretty close =) |
|
Hialeah , Florida |
98 |
19.8% |
4.01 |
12.3% |
4.39 |
7.5% |
4.62 |
55.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary |
|
Honolulu CDP, Hawaii |
97 |
36.4% |
3.18 |
10.6% |
4.47 |
9.8% |
4.51 |
62.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Stree are too big.. Results are very far away from the sample
solutions |
|
Baltimore , Maryland |
97 |
39.6% |
3.02 |
18.2% |
4.09 |
8.7% |
4.57 |
50.2% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Very big displacements |
|
Lincoln , Nebraska |
96 |
8.8% |
4.56 |
7.0% |
4.65 |
60.1% |
1.99 |
60.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Weird report format. Low reaction force |
|
Tacoma , Washington |
96 |
53.5% |
2.33 |
8.2% |
4.59 |
15.8% |
4.21 |
34.2% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are very far from the sample solutions |
|
Jacksonville , Florida |
96 |
19.5% |
4.02 |
4.2% |
4.79 |
62.6% |
1.87 |
34.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
|
|
Wichita , Kansas |
95 |
53.7% |
2.31 |
12.3% |
4.39 |
30.6% |
3.47 |
40.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary, very big displacement |
|
New Orleans , Louisiana |
95 |
56.3% |
2.18 |
3.8% |
4.81 |
41.0% |
2.95 |
33.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are far away from the correct solution |
|
Cincinnati , Ohio |
95 |
9.9% |
4.51 |
1.1% |
4.95 |
90.3% |
0.49 |
66.1% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Really low reaction force |
|
Anaheim , California |
95 |
64.9% |
1.75 |
8.8% |
4.56 |
30.6% |
3.47 |
75.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Weird report format. Results are far from the correct solutions |
|
Fresno , California |
95 |
60.2% |
1.99 |
9.5% |
4.53 |
37.3% |
3.13 |
71.2% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Weird Report Format. Displacement is large |
|
Las Vegas , Nevada |
95 |
2.5% |
4.88 |
5.3% |
4.74 |
131.2% |
0.00 |
65.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No summary |
|
Arlington , Texas |
95 |
22.6% |
3.87 |
15.0% |
4.25 |
70.6% |
1.47 |
75.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are less than half of the correct solution |
|
Buffalo , New York |
94 |
10.5% |
4.48 |
5.1% |
4.74 |
94.9% |
0.26 |
82.6% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Louisville , Kentucky |
94 |
79.2% |
1.04 |
1.0% |
4.95 |
31.2% |
3.44 |
55.5% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are very far away from the sample solutions |
|
Los Angeles , California |
94 |
43.2% |
2.84 |
5.3% |
4.74 |
68.8% |
1.56 |
97.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are about half of the correct values |
|
Anchorage , Alaska |
94 |
9.9% |
4.51 |
13.0% |
4.35 |
96.5% |
0.17 |
64.7% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Resultss are not listed in the summary. Negative reaction force? |
|
Tucson , Arizona |
94 |
146.9% |
0.00 |
7.0% |
4.65 |
15.6% |
4.22 |
60.5% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary |
|
Oakland , California |
94 |
2.7% |
4.86 |
26.6% |
3.67 |
96.0% |
0.20 |
35.6% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Milwaukee , Wisconsin |
94 |
19.8% |
4.01 |
10.5% |
4.47 |
96.5% |
0.17 |
71.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary. Really high reaction force |
|
Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania |
94 |
33.5% |
3.32 |
0.1% |
4.99 |
95.2% |
0.24 |
35.7% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Laredo , Texas |
93 |
62.0% |
1.90 |
6.7% |
4.67 |
61.4% |
1.93 |
32.6% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Your results are very far away from the solutions |
|
Boston , Massachusetts |
93 |
24.3% |
3.78 |
11.5% |
4.43 |
95.2% |
0.24 |
30.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
San Antonio , Texas |
93 |
29.0% |
3.55 |
777.2% |
0.00 |
4.0% |
4.80 |
69.4% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Wrong displacement (didn't surpress the main body), low stress |
|
Plano , Texas |
93 |
39.7% |
3.02 |
0.7% |
4.96 |
95.4% |
0.23 |
33.4% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Toledo , Ohio |
93 |
136.7% |
0.00 |
9.6% |
4.52 |
29.5% |
3.53 |
39.7% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Really high max stress. |
|
Portland , Oregon |
93 |
109.1% |
0.00 |
8.3% |
4.59 |
40.2% |
2.99 |
42.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are very far away from the sample solutions |
|
Virginia Beach , Virginia |
93 |
41.2% |
2.94 |
11.2% |
4.44 |
97.5% |
0.13 |
49.1% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Denver , Colorado |
92 |
106.3% |
0.00 |
7.4% |
4.63 |
49.9% |
2.51 |
50.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are very far away from the sample solutions |
|
Omaha , Nebraska |
92 |
56.8% |
2.16 |
5.3% |
4.74 |
97.8% |
0.11 |
53.2% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Raleigh , North Carolina |
92 |
80.2% |
0.99 |
43.2% |
2.84 |
43.4% |
2.83 |
57.1% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Weird report format. Really small displacement |
|
Austin , Texas |
92 |
66.3% |
1.68 |
5.3% |
4.73 |
97.2% |
0.14 |
99.9% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Sacramento , California |
92 |
57.4% |
2.13 |
15.8% |
4.21 |
96.5% |
0.18 |
41.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary. Max force is measured at a
node |
|
Tampa , Florida |
91 |
146.3% |
0.00 |
9.3% |
4.54 |
70.4% |
1.48 |
64.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
|
|
Atlanta , Georgia |
90 |
79.4% |
1.03 |
15.2% |
4.24 |
97.1% |
0.15 |
84.3% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
San Francisco , California |
90 |
93.8% |
0.31 |
10.5% |
4.47 |
97.0% |
0.15 |
46.2% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are very far away from what they are supposed to be. Max
force is only based on one node. |
|
Cleveland , Ohio |
90 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
7.0% |
4.65 |
99.8% |
0.01 |
31.3% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No max Von Misses Stress. Really small max force? |
|
Kansas , Missouri |
90 |
75.7% |
1.22 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
33.7% |
3.31 |
73.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No displacement |
|
Jersey , New Jersey |
89 |
100.7% |
0.00 |
12.3% |
4.39 |
141.3% |
0.00 |
38.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Your results are very far away from the solutions |
|
Fort Wayne , Indiana |
88 |
54.8% |
2.26 |
640.4% |
0.00 |
76.3% |
1.18 |
66.8% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Displacement of 21.1 mm? Max force is only based on one node |
|
St. Petersburg , Florida |
86 |
2.9% |
4.86 |
2.5% |
4.88 |
72.8% |
1.36 |
###### |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Increased reaction force in the new design? Values are very far away
from the correct solutions |
|
Phoenix , Arizona |
86 |
53.0% |
2.35 |
5.5% |
4.72 |
24.6% |
3.77 |
28.5% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Some values are about half of the correct values |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana |
86 |
48.1% |
2.59 |
8.8% |
4.56 |
30.6% |
3.47 |
29.2% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
|
|
Stockton , California |
85 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
777.2% |
0.00 |
97.1% |
0.14 |
100.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Wrong displacement (did not surpress the part while measuring),
wrong units, no max stress. Results are not listed in summary. Max
force is measured at a point only |
|
Dallas , Texas |
85 |
370.5% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
98.6% |
0.07 |
41.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No data in speed. Your stresses seem a little too big. Max force
only taken from one node. |
|
Mesa , Arizona |
85 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
98.7% |
0.07 |
100.0% |
10 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No new design, weird report format. Results are not listed in the
summary. Max force calculated on one node |
|
Baton Rouge , Louisiana |
84 |
53.0% |
2.35 |
4.2% |
4.79 |
61.5% |
1.93 |
2.2% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
|
|
St. Louis , Missouri |
82 |
40.9% |
2.96 |
11.9% |
4.40 |
99.5% |
0.03 |
###### |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary, no graph. Max force is
measured on a node only. Increased force in new design? |
|
Santa Ana , California |
82 |
50.6% |
2.47 |
8.9% |
4.55 |
97.6% |
0.12 |
29.0% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Max force is only based on one node |
|
Fremont , California |
81 |
78.7% |
1.07 |
12.6% |
4.37 |
79.5% |
1.03 |
-96.5% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Values are very far away from the sample solutions. Increased
reaction force in the new design? |
|
Washington , DC |
81 |
53.4% |
2.33 |
27.7% |
3.61 |
93.9% |
0.30 |
###### |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Increased reaction force in the new design? Values are very far away
from the correct solutions |
|
El Paso , Texas |
81 |
4.2% |
4.79 |
514.0% |
0.00 |
75.8% |
1.21 |
-19.4% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Results are not listed in the summary, no graph. Max force is
measured on a node only at the case. Displacement is measured with
the main body. |
|
Minneapolis , Minnesota |
80 |
50.9% |
2.45 |
95.1% |
0.25 |
45.7% |
2.72 |
###### |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
Force increased after modification? Really small displacement |
|
Glendale , Arizona |
78 |
35.8% |
3.21 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No data on displacements and forces. Summary doesn't contain all the
data required |
|
Columbus , Ohio |
75 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
20 |
No submission |
|
St. Paul , Minnesota |
55 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
0 |
No working result |
|
Riverside , California |
55 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
1 |
55 |
0 |
No working result |
|
Memphis , Tennessee |
0 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No submission |
|
Corpus Christi , Texas |
0 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No submission |
|
Long Beach , California |
0 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No working result |
|
Charlotte , North Carolina |
0 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
100.0% |
0.00 |
0.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No submission |
|
|
|
|