PS9 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
92.59 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
66.70 |
61.17 |
0.08 |
54.61 |
49.92 |
0.09 |
67.93 |
80.14 |
-0.18 |
0.98 |
0.97 |
0.93 |
0.92 |
0.97 |
|
|
|
Baseline |
|
|
|
Revised Design |
|
|
|
25.0 |
25.0 |
|
|
minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum |
|
|
minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum |
|
|
minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum |
25 |
6.25 |
6.25 |
6.25 |
6.25 |
|
Codename |
Grade |
Current design simulation result submitted? (1 = yes, 0 =
no) |
txt file submitted? (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
Max torque soln - Worm Front |
Max torque stdnt - Worm front |
% difference |
Max torque soln - Worm Rear |
Max torque stdnt - Worm rear |
% difference |
Vertical Distance traveled soln |
Vertical Distance traveled stdnt |
% difference |
submitted .iaa revised file |
Simulation time (1 is < 2 secs more,0.5 = more than 2sec, 0 is no
submission) |
Revised Max Torque Worm Front (1 = less than baseline, 0.75 = more
than baseline, 0 no submission) |
Revised Max Torque Worm Rear (1 = less than baseline,0.75 = more
than baseline 0 = no submission) |
Vertical Distance Traveled (1 = less than 10 mm loss, 0 = more than
10 mm loss) |
Comments |
St. Paul , Minnesota |
99.94 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.00% |
54.61 |
54.6 |
0.02% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Columbus , Ohio |
99.94 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.00% |
54.61 |
54.6 |
0.02% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Tampa , Florida |
99.94 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.00% |
54.61 |
54.6 |
0.02% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Atlanta , Georgia |
99.94 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.00% |
54.61 |
54.6 |
0.02% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Raleigh , North Carolina |
99.94 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.00% |
54.61 |
54.6 |
0.02% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Arlington , Texas |
99.62 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.59 |
0.16% |
54.61 |
54.71 |
-0.18% |
67.93 |
67.95 |
-0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Wrong naming convention |
Kansas , Missouri |
99.29 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.58 |
0.18% |
54.61 |
54.9 |
-0.52% |
67.93 |
67.93 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Washington , DC |
97.47 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.72 |
1.47% |
54.61 |
54.04 |
1.05% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Los Angeles , California |
97.23 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.9 |
1.31% |
67.93 |
68 |
-0.11% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Wrong naming convention |
Austin , Texas |
97.16 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.84 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.77 |
1.54% |
67.93 |
67.93 |
0.00% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Norfolk , Virginia |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.84 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
San Antonio , Texas |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Jersey , New Jersey |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Buffalo , New York |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Santa Ana , California |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Baton Rouge , Louisiana |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Virginia Beach , Virginia |
97.15 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Minneapolis , Minnesota |
97.14 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.74 |
1.44% |
54.61 |
53.85 |
1.40% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Anaheim , California |
97.14 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Plano , Texas |
97.13 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.31% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.95 |
-0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Jacksonville , Florida |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Denver , Colorado |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Phoenix , Arizona |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Baltimore , Maryland |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Portland , Oregon |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Toledo , Ohio |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Honolulu CDP, Hawaii |
97.12 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Fremont , California |
97.09 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.9 |
1.20% |
54.61 |
53.7 |
1.67% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Glendale , Arizona |
97.09 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.9 |
0.04% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana |
96.93 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.68 |
1.53% |
54.61 |
54.05 |
1.03% |
67.93 |
68.27 |
-0.51% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Louisville , Kentucky |
96.60 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.54 |
0.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Lincoln , Nebraska |
96.60 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.53% |
67.93 |
67.54 |
0.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Hialeah , Florida |
96.59 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.54 |
0.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Fresno , California |
96.58 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.74 |
1.44% |
54.61 |
53.84 |
1.42% |
67.93 |
67.54 |
0.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Seattle , Washington |
96.53 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
67.5 |
0.63% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Omaha , Nebraska |
96.51 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
67.3 |
-0.90% |
54.61 |
53.3 |
2.40% |
67.93 |
67.8 |
0.18% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Laredo , Texas |
96.50 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.41 |
1.93% |
54.61 |
53.77 |
1.54% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Las Vegas , Nevada |
96.20 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.31% |
54.61 |
53.79 |
1.51% |
67.93 |
67.26 |
0.98% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Anchorage , Alaska |
96.06 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.7 |
1.67% |
67.93 |
67.3 |
0.92% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
St. Petersburg , Florida |
95.88 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.74 |
1.44% |
54.61 |
53.46 |
2.12% |
67.93 |
67.54 |
0.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
New Orleans , Louisiana |
94.98 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
0.01% |
54.61 |
54.62 |
-0.02% |
67.93 |
154.3 |
-127.19% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Boston , Massachusetts |
93.95 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.69 |
0.02% |
54.61 |
54.05 |
1.04% |
67.93 |
154.3 |
-127.23% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Wichita , Kansas |
93.33 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
66.79 |
-0.13% |
54.61 |
51.14 |
6.35% |
67.93 |
66.89 |
1.53% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
San Francisco , California |
92.16 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
154.3 |
-127.16% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Milwaukee , Wisconsin |
92.16 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
153.9 |
-126.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Tucson , Arizona |
92.16 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.8 |
1.35% |
54.61 |
53.8 |
1.49% |
67.93 |
153.9 |
-126.57% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania |
91.86 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.97 |
1.10% |
54.61 |
55.73 |
-2.04% |
67.93 |
150.2 |
-121.08% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Dallas , Texas |
90.86 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.86 |
1.26% |
54.61 |
53.73 |
1.62% |
67.93 |
67.92 |
0.01% |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
1 day late, Revised torque should not be larger than baseline
torque |
Mesa , Arizona |
90.56 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
40.43 |
25.97% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
1 |
|
St. Louis , Missouri |
89.99 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
73.51 |
-10.20% |
54.61 |
61.48 |
-12.57% |
67.93 |
67.93 |
-0.01% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Oakland , California |
89.98 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
-23.8 |
135.63% |
54.61 |
-35.8 |
165.60% |
67.93 |
67.94 |
-0.02% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Negative torque? Revised torque should not be larger than baseline
torque |
Sacramento , California |
89.95 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.31% |
54.61 |
53.79 |
1.51% |
67.93 |
67.26 |
0.98% |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque |
Cleveland , Ohio |
86.55 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
63.62 |
4.62% |
54.61 |
56.71 |
-3.83% |
67.93 |
155.4 |
-128.83% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
Cincinnati , Ohio |
85.00 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
14.8 |
77.81% |
54.61 |
14.8 |
72.90% |
67.93 |
154.2 |
-126.94% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height |
El Paso , Texas |
82.39 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
55.1 |
17.39% |
54.61 |
65 |
-19.02% |
67.93 |
67 |
1.36% |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque |
Riverside , California |
78.75 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
-23.8 |
135.68% |
54.61 |
-35.8 |
165.55% |
67.93 |
154.3 |
-127.16% |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height.
Negative torque? Revised torque should not be larger than baseline
torque |
Fort Wayne , Indiana |
60.00 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
80.25 |
-20.31% |
54.61 |
80.25 |
-46.94% |
67.93 |
25 |
63.19% |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
no revised design |
Corpus Christi , Texas |
42.18 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
65.83 |
1.30% |
54.61 |
53.78 |
1.54% |
67.93 |
64.54 |
4.98% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
no revised design |
Long Beach , California |
29.05 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
3.34 |
94.99% |
54.61 |
2.68 |
95.09% |
67.93 |
67.28 |
0.95% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 days late |
Memphis , Tennessee |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
66.7 |
|
|
54.61 |
|
|
67.93 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Not submitted |
Stockton , California |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
66.7 |
|
|
54.61 |
|
|
67.93 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Not submitted |
Charlotte , North Carolina |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
66.7 |
|
|
54.61 |
|
|
67.93 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Not submitted |
Tacoma , Washington |
0.00 |
1 |
1 |
66.7 |
|
100.00% |
54.61 |
|
100.00% |
67.93 |
|
100.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Not submitted |
|
|
|
|
|